| Jumpp example rant (Note, Jumpp is not democrat or republican, he votes for both etc, but if you get bent out of shape over opinions read no further. He is explaining to me an issue in the news.)
[16:38] <Jumpp> The Bush White House aggressively browbeat the CIA.
[16:39] <Jumpp> Cheney went down there all the time to twist arms.
[16:39] <Jumpp> An official as high as Cheney intervening at that low a level is
unprecedented.
[16:40] <Jumpp> The Bush Admin idealogues were convinced that the State Dept adn the
CIA were a bunch of softheaded liberal status-quo-protecting sissies.
[16:40] <Jumpp> They set up a special commission inside the white house and fed them
raw intelligence data.
[16:40] <Jumpp> These guys were political appointees, and they produced the
conclusions that the CIA was reluctant to give.
[16:40] <veenu> wow I didnt know that
[16:41] <Jumpp> CIA was always hedging. We "think" hussein "probably" has this. We
think that report is unreliable. We think that source is compromised. We think
that defector will say whatever he thinks his interrogators want to hear.
[16:41] <Jumpp> So they set up Doug Feith and some political cronies in the "office
of special projects" to bypass the career intelligence analysts at CIA.
[16:41] <Jumpp> This is called "stovepiping."
[16:42] <Jumpp> That's when you bypass the analysts and cherry-pick the raw data to
support your foreordained conclusion.
[16:42] <veenu> and they even have a name for it
[16:42] <Jumpp> The Bush people did it. And it's well documented because they were
PROUD of it befor ethe war.
[16:42] <Jumpp> They were shouting to anyone who'd listen that the State Department
and CIA were a bunch of dictator-appeasing peaceniks, and it was their intention to
turn it around and get them to recognize the threat that Hussein presented.
[16:43] <Jalynfane> I can't wait for the Admin to turn it around and blame the CIA
for the intel
[16:43] <Jumpp> Right-wing columnists picked up the line and interviewed lots of
administration people, then wrote columns berating the CIA and State for having
their heads in the sand.
[16:43] <Jumpp> They're doing that now.
[16:43] <Jumpp> But Tenet is pushing back.
[16:43] <Jalynfane> Wait, i think they did already
[16:43] <Tharkis> jalyn, they're doing that now
[16:43] <Jumpp> And thus we have the Plame affair.
[16:43] <Jalynfane> My sarcasm was to slow
[16:43] <Jumpp> This whole AWOL thing is just a sideshow.
[16:44] <Jumpp> It's gonna get blown off the front pages as soon as the Plamegate
grand jury starts handing down indictments.
[16:44] <veenu> the democrats are holding back until the real elections I guess
[16:44] <Jumpp> Which I expect will be in the next couple months.
[16:44] <Jumpp> The AWOL stuff is sketchy and reveals bad character and some recent
coverups. But that's all.
[16:45] <Jumpp> The Plame thing is orders of magnitude worse.
[16:45] <Naydien> Plame?
[16:45] <Jumpp> That one's a REAL scandal, not just juice for politics junkies.
[16:45] <Jumpp> Okay. I'll make this quick:
[16:45] <Naydien> I probably know of it, just not by that nickname
[16:45] <Jumpp> During the run-up to the war, Cheney asked the CIA if a report he'd
seen was reliable.
[16:46] <Jumpp> The report indicated that Iraq had tried to buy a kind of processed
uranium (yellowcake) from Niger.
[16:46] <Jumpp> If true, it'd be clear evidence of Hussein's nuclear program.
[16:46] <Jumpp> So the CIA sent someone to check it out.
[16:46] <Jumpp> They sent Joe Wilson.
[16:46] <veenu> how did they "send"
[16:46] <Jumpp> He's a former ambassador to both Iraq and Niger, and had been in Iraq
during the first gulf war.
[16:47] <Jumpp> He knew lots of people in the area, and he went unofficially to ask
some questions and examine some records.
[16:47] <Jumpp> He had lots of friends in the Nigerian ministry that controlled the
uranium mines.
[16:47] <Jumpp> And he found, pretty conclusively, that the report was soggy
bullshit. He came home and reported as much to his CIA debriefer.
[16:48] <Jumpp> This wasn't what the administration wanted to hear, so in the State
of the Union address, they reported the Niger Yellowcake story anyway.
[16:48] <Jumpp> Since their own intelligence agency was telling them it was bullshit,
they phrased it funny.
[16:48] <Jumpp> Bush said "The British have learned that Iraq tried to buy
Yellowcake..."
[16:48] <veenu> wow
[16:48] <Jumpp> Because the British DID think the report was genuine.
[16:48] <Jalynfane> Because we told them it was?
[16:48] <Jumpp> No, apparently they dug it up first.
[16:49] <Jumpp> Now, we never ever ever make policy on the basis of someone else's
intelligence. That is American policy.
[16:49] <Jalynfane> Correct
[16:49] <Jumpp> We check everything ourselves. Always.
[16:49] <Jumpp> This is longstanding religion in the intelligence & policy community.
It's just not done.
[16:49] <Jumpp> Anyway, that went into the SOTU anyway.
[16:49] <Jalynfane> You need a radio show dude, for real.
[16:50] <Jumpp> You may recall that that claim became controversial.
[16:50] <veenu> amen jaly
[16:50] <Jumpp> It's the famous "sixteen words."
[16:50] <Jumpp> Joe Wilson, the guy the CIA sent, was the one who blew it open.
[16:50] <Jumpp> He found a reporter and told him that the yellowcake story was
bullshit, and that he knew because he was the guy who was sent to check it out, and
that Cheney KNEW he said it was bullshit.
[16:50] <Jumpp> This became a pretty ugly scandal.
[16:51] <veenu> OMG this is the guy with the WIFE
[16:51] <veenu> I just googled it!
[16:51] <Jalynfane> Oh wow, really?
[16:51] <Jalynfane> New ballpark, this gonna get oogly
[16:51] <veenu> I hope bush's admin is screwed over this.
[16:51] <veenu> I mean wow.
[16:52] <Jumpp> Oh, I'm just getting started. Vee's right.
[16:52] <Jumpp> Anyway, Wilson burned the administration.
[16:52] <Jumpp> So they burned back.
[16:52] <Jumpp> See, Wilson's wife is CIA.
[16:52] <Jumpp> She was giving lots of briefings at the White House.
[16:52] <Jumpp> She wasn't always doing that job.
[16:53] <Jumpp> She was working deep-cover on WMD proliferation for a long time.
[16:53] <Jalynfane> clandestine, yeah
[16:53] <Jumpp> But CIA thinks that Aldritch Ames gave her up.
[16:53] <Jumpp> So about the time they debriefed Ames, they quit exposing her
(Valerie Plame) on overseas assignments.
[16:53] <veenu> so CIA must hate bush admin because of this too
[16:53] <Jumpp> She still worked on WMD, but back at home now.
[16:53] <Jumpp> However, once a NOC, always a NOC.
[16:54] <veenu> NOC?
[16:54] <Jumpp> Non-official cover.
[16:54] <veenu> ok
[16:54] <Jalynfane> Non offical c.. yeah
[16:54] <Jumpp> There are two kinds of CIA cover. Official cover and non-official.
[16:54] <Jumpp> Official cover is common. You're really CIA, but you're posing as an
embassy attache, or some other government official.
[16:54] <Jumpp> Your status as a spy is frequently an open secret.
[16:55] <Jumpp> In Paris, say, the identity of the CIA station chief at the embassy
will be well-known among the cocktail party set.
[16:55] <veenu> ok I get it
[16:55] <Jumpp> Non-official cover is the james bond shit.
[16:55] <veenu> haha
[16:55] <Jumpp> The "if you're captured we'll deny we know who you are"
[16:55] <Jumpp> Anwyay, that's what Plame was.
[16:56] <Jumpp> So. The White house is pissed at Joe Wilson and they need to
discredit his story.
[16:56] <Jumpp> So.
[16:56] <Jumpp> Someone in the WH decides to leak to the press that Wilson's
assignment was hack-job nepotism and he only got the assignment because his wife
was CIA.
[16:57] <Jumpp> They call six reporters.
[16:57] <Jalynfane> Cause that somehow makes the data irrelavant
[16:57] <Jalynfane> [sp]
[16:57] <Jumpp> Five want no part of the story. They're not going to help the
government punish a whistleblower.
[16:57] <Jumpp> But the sixth, Bob Novak, runs the story.
[16:57] <veenu> wow
[16:57] <veenu> who is novak again, I heard that name
[16:57] <Jumpp> Sun-Times columnist and very visible pundit.
[16:57] <veenu> oh yeah
[16:58] <Jumpp> You'll see him on CNN a lot, parroting administration talking points
in a whiny voice.
[16:58] <Jumpp> Old grumpy guy who they trot out any time they need someone to slam a
Democrat.
[16:58] <Jumpp> Anyway, shit immediately hits the fan.
[16:58] <Jumpp> Because Wilson's wife isn't just "at CIA." She's a bloody NOC, and
revealing her identity is a felony.
[16:59] <veenu> wow
[16:59] <Jumpp> Someone made a terrible error.
[16:59] <Jumpp> It's not clear if the leaker knew she was a NOC or not. That remains
fuzzy.
[17:00] <veenu> so where does all this stand right now?
[17:00] <Jumpp> Some argue that she was probably seen at the white house a fair bit
and her husband is famous anyway and her identity was an open secret.
[17:00] <Jumpp> Some argue that whoever leaked it HAD to know she was a NOC.
[17:00] <Jumpp> Where it stands now:
[17:00] <Jumpp> The CIA gathered up a bunch of evidence and dumped it in the Justice
Department's lap, demanding an investigation.
[17:01] <Jumpp> Justice sat on it for awhile, then started moving when the CIA
started leaking details to reporters to prod them along.
[17:01] <Jalynfane> I hope they burn some one with that
[17:01] <Jalynfane> Revealing the NOC I mean
[17:01] <Jumpp> Ashcroft was personally overseeing the investigation. The President
said that he wanted to get to the bottom of it but opined that it was unlikely they
would and that "leaks happen."
[17:02] <Jumpp> Note the brazen spin here: A leak is a leak.
[17:02] <veenu> hah
[17:02] <Jalynfane> Yeah, no doubt.
[17:02] <Jumpp> The Bush line is that the real crime was someone leaking to a
reporter.
[17:02] <Jumpp> The fact that they leaked secrets that threaten national security is
irrelevant. THat they leaked anything at all was the bad stuff.
[17:02] <Jumpp> Anyway, around December, Ashcroft recused himself from the
investigation.
[17:03] <veenu> recused?
[17:03] <veenu> opposite of excuse?
[17:03] <Jumpp> He handed the whole thing over to a Pete Fitzgerald, a federal
prosecutor from Chicago.
[17:03] <Jumpp> He stepped awya from it.
[17:03] <veenu> ok
[17:03] <Jumpp> The only reason he could or would do this would be if he had personal
ties to a target of the investigation.
[17:04] <Jumpp> So it's pretty clear that some time in December, one of his
subordinates at Justice notified Ashcroft that so-and-so was now a suspect, and
Ashcroft has financial or significant personal/political ties to so-and-so, and was
forced to step off.
[17:04] <veenu> eep
[17:04] <Jumpp> As I write these words, a Grand Jury is sitting in Washington,
hearing testimony behind closed doors.
[17:04] <veenu> and when will we know?
[17:05] <veenu> what is this trial called?
[17:05] <Jumpp> There's no trial yet.
[17:05] <Jumpp> The grand jury is a secret proceeding.
[17:05] <Jumpp> We know about it because while all the attorneys and jurors and
judges are sworn to secrecy, witnesses can say whatever they like.
[17:05] <Jumpp> I should say the prosecutors are sworn to secrecy.
[17:06] <Jumpp> The grand jury has been chugging along for several weeks now.
[17:06] <Jumpp> Everything up to now has been, pretty much, fact.
[17:06] <Jumpp> Now we move on to some hearsay.
[17:06] <veenu> woohoo gossip!
[17:06] <Jumpp> Word is the prosecutors are about done interviewing everyone involved
except the Six reporters.
[17:07] <Jumpp> And that the reporters will be subpoenaed soon. That is, they'll be
compelled to testify before the grand jury.
[17:07] <Jumpp> At which point they'll be asked to name the person who called them
and gave them Plame's name.
[17:07] <Jumpp> They'll likely invoke privilege, which invocation will have no legal
force for a variety of reasons, and they'll either sing or go to jail.
[17:07] <veenu> deepthroat!
[17:08] <veenu> would all 6 invoke privilege?
[17:08] <Jumpp> They could try, but it won't have any legal force.
[17:08] <Jumpp> There are a variety of reasons why, but here are the two big ones:
[17:09] <Jumpp> 1. If the prosecutors can show that they've exhausted every other
avenue of inquiry and that they're only asking the reporters to confirm what they
already know, the reporters legally have to talk. The prosecutors have been
planning for specifically this.
[17:09] <Jumpp> And their whole strategy has been built on showing that they've
talked to everyone else first and are only reluctantly at the end turning to the
reporters.
[17:10] <Jumpp> 2. Word has it the prosecutors have been getting everyone involved to
sign documents that waive privilege.
[17:10] <veenu> hmm
[17:10] <Jalynfane> so that the reporters will need to also?
[17:11] <Jumpp> So any reporter who wants to invoke privilege gets hit from two
directions: First, you can't in this case. Second, even if you could, your leaker
has already waived it.
[17:11] <veenu> so they cant plead the "5th"?
[17:11] <Jumpp> They cannot.
[17:11] <Salabak> yeah FBI has been asking higher ups to sign waivers in the
confidentiallity agreements
[17:11] <Jumpp> The 5th amendment protects you from self-incrimination.
[17:11] <Tharkis> nothing the reporters can say would be "self incriminating"
[17:11] <Jalynfane> I don't think you can plead the fifth in a grand jury indictment
[17:11] <Jumpp> The reporters aren't suspects and have no constitutional right to
refuse to testify on the grounds that they could incriminate themselves.
[17:11] <veenu> ah not incriminating some dude
[17:11] <Tharkis> they'd be testifying against another, not themselves
[17:11] <veenu> ah ah.
[17:11] <Jumpp> Further, the reporters would be offered immunity in return for their
testimony if that's all it took to get htem to sing.
[17:12] <Jumpp> And of the six, only Novak did anything illegal anyway.
[17:12] <Jumpp> The five who didn't repeat the story didn't commit a crime.
[17:12] <veenu> good guys
[17:12] <Jumpp> So the grand jury is about done.
[17:12] <veenu> guys (including gals in that usage)
[17:12] <Jumpp> And this is all about to explode onto the front page.
[17:12] <Tharkis> heh why wouldnt i be supprised if the leak to the reporters turned
out to be ashcroft or someone working under his direction
[17:12] <Jumpp> One of two things will happen.
[17:12] <Jumpp> 1. Indictments (formal charges) will be handed down.
[17:12] <Tharkis> maybe rumsfeld
[17:12] <Jumpp> or
[17:12] <Jumpp> 2. A reporter will be called to testify.
[17:13] <Jumpp> Either will generate a blizzard of press.
[17:13] <Jumpp> Also, it's pretty well-known who the leaker is:
[17:13] <veenu> hah
[17:13] <Jumpp> Scooter Libby, a senior Cheney staffer.
[17:13] <Jumpp> Maybe his chief of staff.
[17:13] <veenu> with a name like that he wont last long even in white colar prison
[17:13] <Jumpp> Widely regarded in the capitol as a political hatchet-man and
nobody's surprised it's him.
[17:13] <Jumpp> He's a political guy.
[17:13] <Jalynfane> Ashcroft or Rumsfield are not dumb, they would have no direct
involvement in chatting with reporters
[17:14] <Jumpp> If you watch the West Wing, Libby is Josh Lyman.
[17:14] <veenu> ah, but we like Josh.
[17:14] <Jumpp> Yes, but Josh is a politics guy.
[17:14] <Jumpp> He's a knife fighter.
[17:14] <veenu> nice description
[17:15] <Jumpp> They bring that out more this season, BTW.
[17:15] <Jumpp> Anyway.
[17:15] <Jumpp> The point is that Libby isn't an economist or a public policy guy.
[17:15] <Jumpp> He's just a political strategist, and nobody's surprised that he'd be
both mean enough and dumb enough to pull such a stunt.
[17:16] <Jalynfane> It actually makes me happy that 5 of 6 reporters would not run
that story
[17:16] <veenu> takes arrogance to think you can get away with that kind of mafia
mentality in our white house.
[17:16] <Jalynfane> for whatever reason
[17:16] <Jumpp> Rumsfeld is an old pro. He surely takes national security too
seriously to attempt such a stunt in the first place, and would in any case be
aware of how illegal it is.
[17:16] <veenu> aye jaly
[17:16] <Jumpp> Much as I hate to say it, Cheney too is probably way too smart.
[17:16] <Jumpp> He has too much time in real policy positions to make a mistake that
dumb.
|